New study finds significant differences between organic and non-organic food

13 July 2014
Last update: 13/07/14 22:22

Carlo Leifert
More from Carlo


In the largest study of its kind, an international team of experts led by Newcastle University, UK, has shown that organic crops and crop-based foods are up to 69% higher in a number of key antioxidants than conventionally-grown crops.

Analysing 343 studies into the compositional differences between organic and conventional crops, the team found that a switch to eating organic fruit, vegetable and cereals – and food made from them – would provide additional antioxidants equivalent to eating between 1-2 extra portions of fruit and vegetables a day.

The study, published today in the prestigious British Journal of Nutrition, also shows significantly lower levels of toxic heavy metals in organic crops. Cadmium, which is one of only three metal contaminants along with lead and mercury for which the European Commission has set maximum permitted contamination levels in food, was found to be almost 50% lower in organic crops than conventionally-grown ones.

Newcastle University’s Professor Carlo Leifert, who led the study, says: “This study demonstrates that choosing food produced according to organic standards can lead to increased intake of nutritionally desirable antioxidants and reduced exposure to toxic heavy metals.

“This constitutes an important addition to the information currently available to consumers which until now has been confusing and in many cases is conflicting.”

New methods used to analyse the data

This is the most extensive analysis of the nutrient content in organic vs conventionally-produced foods ever undertaken and is the result of a groundbreaking new systematic literature review and meta-analysis by the international team.

The findings contradict those of a 2009 UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) commissioned study which found there were no substantial differences or significant nutritional benefits from organic food.

The FSA commissioned study based its conclusions on only 46 publications covering crops, meat and dairy, while Newcastle led meta-analysis is based on data from 343 peer-reviewed publications on composition difference between organic and conventional crops now available.

“The main difference between the two studies is time,” explains Professor Leifert, who is Professor of Ecological Agriculture at Newcastle University

“Research in this area has been slow to take off the ground and we have far more data available to us now than five years ago”.

Dr Gavin Stewart, a Lecturer in Evidence Synthesis and the meta-analysis expert in the Newcastle team, added: “The much larger evidence base available in this synthesis allowed us to use more appropriate statistical methods to draw more definitive conclusions regarding the differences between organic and conventional crops”

What the findings mean 

The study, funded jointly by the European Framework 6 programme and the Sheepdrove Trust, found that concentrations of antioxidants such as polyphenolics were between 18-69% higher in organically-grown crops. Numerous studies have linked antioxidants to a reduced risk of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases and certain cancers.

Substantially lower concentrations of a range of the toxic heavy metal cadmium were also detected in organic crops (on average 48% lower).

Nitrogen concentrations were found to be significantly lower in organic crops. Concentrations of total nitrogen were 10%, nitrate 30% and nitrite 87% lower in organic compared to conventional crops. The study also found that pesticide residues were four times more likely to be found in conventional crops than organic ones.

Professor Charles Benbrook, one of the authors of the study and a leading scientist based at Washington State University, explains: “Our results are highly relevant and significant and will help both scientists and consumers sort through the often conflicting information currently available on the nutrient density of organic and conventional plant-based foods.”

Professor Leifert added: “The organic vs non-organic debate has rumbled on for decades now but the evidence from this study is overwhelming – that organic food is high in antioxidants and lower in toxic metals and pesticides.

“But this study should just be a starting point. We have shown without doubt there are composition differences between organic and conventional crops, now there is an urgent need to carry out well-controlled human dietary intervention and cohort studies specifically designed to identify and quantify the health impacts of switching to organic food.”

The authors of this study welcome the continued public and scientific debate on this important subject. The entire database generated and used for this analysis is freely available on the Newcastle University website  for the benefit of other experts and interested members of the public.

This is an open access paper  “Higher antioxidant concentrations and less cadmium and pesticide residues in organically-grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses.” Baranski, M. et al. British Journal of Nutrition.

This post appears courtesy of Newcastle University



  1. Pingback: Benefits of Organic Food: It's More Nutritious | Big Green PurseBig Green Purse

  2. Pingback: | NP NEWS | The online home of Natural Products magazine

  3. Pingback: Yes, Organic Food is Really Better for You in Some Ways, Say Scientists | Care2 Causes

  4. Pingback: Organic Foods Are Higher in Cancer-Fighting Antioxidants, New Study Shows | Care2 Healthy Living

  5. Kramer 18 July 2014 10:44

  6. Pingback: Research Excercise « Neuroscience in Action: Section 2

  7. Pingback: Organic Food IS Better For You | The Stay-at-Home Feminist Mom

  8. Pingback: The Paleo PI | Fact of the week – 13 August

  9. Pingback: Biologische voeding bevat meer antioxidanten | Nederlands Gezondheid website

  10. Suely Manzoli 19 August 2014 17:27

    I'd like to have this content to improve my knowledge about nutrition in pdf into my e-mail address, specilly about nitrogen concentration and the connection of danger to the healthy. Thank you

    1. Jo Rennie 27 October 2014 10:33

      Hi Suely,

      You can register for free alerts from BJN at

      However, you (or your institution) will need to have a subscription to access any content that is not open access.

      Let me know if you need any more details.

      Kind regards,


  11. Pingback: Why Organic Food vs Non Organic?

  12. Pingback: Eating Tips » Organic Vs Non Organic Food Journal

  13. Pingback: Spending Your Wellness Money Well - mudLotusHealth

  14. Pingback: Los vegetales orgánicos tienen más antioxidantes | Sentido y sostenibilidad

  15. Pingback: Leifert, todo un ejemplo | ilFrenchie

  16. Pingback: Organic is healthier | Number Seven

  17. WilliamLive 8 June 2016 16:53

    Enjoyed every bit of your forum topic.Much thanks again. Really Cool. Witkowski

  18. David McCrea 28 July 2016 07:49

    Thank you for providing some actual science to this normally emotionally, politically and economically driven subject.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. All fields are required.