Can nutritional intervention delay the passage of time?
The Nutrition Paper of the Month for November is from Nutrition Research Reviews and is entitled ‘Energy restriction and potential energy restriction mimetics’
In model organisms such as yeast, worms, flies and rodents, reducing energy intake prolongs lifespan.
We have reviewed the scientific literature on this topic and summarize how energy restriction may affect the organism’s metabolism and hormonal status and how it may influence processes that have been linked to ageing.
These processes include accumulated oxidative damage, increased inflammation, reduced mitochondrial turnover and impaired degradation of proteins. Energy restriction appears to improve the endogenous anti-oxidative defence, reduce the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, promote mitochondrial biogenesis and lead to degradation of old mitochondria and no-longer-needed proteins.
We discuss which kinases (mTOR, AMPK), transcription factors (FoxOs, NFκB, Nrf2) and other proteins (PGC1α, sirtuins, IFG1) may contribute to these putatively rejuvenating changes but also mention the down-sides of reducing energy intake.
Apart from these negative effects, in humans life-long energy restriction is not very feasible. However, there are substances that -in part- mimic the effects of energy restriction without food intake having to be reduced. Some of these compounds such as resveratrol, lipoic acid and spermidine are consumed as part of our diet. Dietary supplementation of resveratrol, of which considerable amounts are found in red wine, increased the lifespan of flies, yeast and mice on a high fat diet. In cell culture experiments, resveratrol affected molecular targets similar to energy restriction. Because of these promising findings resveratrol has attracted considerable attention. However, in other longevity studies with flies and mice, resveratrol did not affect lifespan and there is a lack of long-term studies in humans.
Therefore, it remains unclear whether resveratrol supplementation would benefit humans although its toxicity appears low. Other putative energy restriction mimetics, for example, metformin and rapamycin are used as pharmaceutical drugs but rapamycin in particular can cause severe side effects such as immunosuppression and thus is not suitable for supplementation in healthy humans. So far, interesting energy restriction mimetic candidate substances have been identified and it is feasible that there are more bioactives with such properties to be found in different diets which merit further research.
This article is freely available until 31 December 2015*
Nutrition Society Paper of the Month
Each month a paper is selected by one of the Editors of the five Nutrition Society Publications (British Journal of Nutrition, Public Health Nutrition, Nutrition Research Reviews, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society and Journal of Nutritional Science). This paper is freely available for one month.
*Due to issues with our blog all papers selected as the ‘NS Paper of the Month’ from September – November will be freely available until 31 December 2015