Skip to content

Cambridge CoreCambridge Core blog Cambridge Core Blog

  • Home
  • Contact
  • Main menu
  • Science & Technology
    • Earth & Environmental Science
    • Engineering
    • Life Sciences
    • Materials Science
    • Mathematics
    • Physics
  • Medicine & Health Sciences
    • Nutrition
    • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Humanities
    • Archaeology
    • Architecture
    • Area Studies
    • Classics
    • History
    • Literature
    • Music and Drama
    • Philosophy
    • Religious Studies
  • Social Sciences
    • Business and Management
    • Economics
    • Law
    • Linguistics
    • Political Science and International Relations
    • Social Studies
  • Librarians
  • Open Research

Tag archive: PRW16

The importance of sharing review data: helping the workload of peer reviewers

R. Michael Alvarez | 22 Sep 2016

Quality reviews are critical for peer review.   As a co-editor of Political Analysis, I ask a lot from our reviewers, in particular that they read and evaluate complex statistical, mathematical, and computational research.  In many of our submissions, authors provide computer code, with detailed supplementary materials, and reviewers need to examine those materials.  Political Analysis reviewers are excellent.…


Peer review in the open-access humanities

Jack Groutage | 21 Sep 2016

Among the biggest consternations around the idea of open access (OA) – that is, that research work be made openly available for anybody to read and re-use without paying – has been peer review.  Many academics feared that the strict standards of peer review that have governed academic publishing for some time would evaporate, particularly in gold models of OA where the author’s institution pays a fee and there is a seeming incentive for publishers to take on more work.…


Matt Day, Head of Open Access, shares his thoughts on the importance of the peer review process for open access content

Jack Groutage | 20 Sep 2016

What effect does Open Access have on peer-review? We ask Cambridge Head of Open Access and Data Publishing Matt Day.   Matt, are all Cambridge Open Access publications peer-reviewed?…


Four top tips and four common pitfalls for peer reviewers

Jack Groutage | 19 Sep 2016

An effective review for a book proposal needs to consider many aspects – all geared towards situating the proposal in the context of the discipline. In this article, two of our commissioning editors explain four top tips and four common pitfalls to bear in mind when reviewing a book proposal.


Most read

Ancient Athlete
From the Ancient to the Modern: How have the Olympic games changed?
New study finds significant differences between organic and non-organic food
Tuff-Luv Spark Kindle Cover with Light - by joeyanne
Kindle Part 4: 5 things you didn’t know you could do on your Kindle
Journals_shelved
Publishing Your First Journal Article: an Academic Publisher’s view – 1
Bookshelf
Dealing with rejection: Advice from an editor
Journals_shelved
How to get your book published, part 1

Trending

Free access to all 2012 content on Cambridge Journals Online
Researchers urge more people to report cases of facial paralysis in air travel
New study finds significant differences between organic and non-organic food
Tuff-Luv Spark Kindle Cover with Light - by joeyanne
Kindle Part 4: 5 things you didn’t know you could do on your Kindle
New institutional ebook pricing 2014
How we make research available in developing countries

Latest Tweets

  • Today is the last full day at @INSneuro . Be sure to stop by for free journal copies and 20% off on books.… https://t.co/XfBqXShr0e

    9 hours
  • Don't forget to browse recent articles included in our free MRS Energy & Sustainability collections on the topics o… https://t.co/daO3q6AY4Q

    1 day
  • RT @cambUP_maths: Volume 71, Issue 1 of the Canadian Journal of Mathematics is the first published by Cambridge University Press. Enj… https://t.co/e0MSPLifXB

    1 day
    3 retweets
  • RT @ICLQ_jnl: Take a look at the contents of our latest issue and maybe come and have a read! https://t.co/MSg9v2rx9a https://t.co/9XoTcAXvku

    2 days
    4 retweets
  • RT @CUP_Law: The latest issue of World Trade Review includes articles on #tradegains, #NAFTA, #coal subsidies, and more. Read th… https://t.co/u56ZpTpXJr

    2 days
    1 retweet
  • RT @cambUP_History: We are please to extend our celebration of Chinese New Year by offering a free journals collection for a limited-ti… https://t.co/UEqoGFdKjp

    3 days
    18 retweets

Tags

academic publishing animal animal Article of the Month Animal Science British Journal of Nutrition Business and Human Rights Journal Cambridge Journals Cambridge Journals Online CJO Climate Change conservation diet environmental conservation fluid dynamics Fluid Mechanics health history human rights JFM Journal of Fluid Mechanics journal of social policy law Libraries Materials Research Materials Research Society Medicine mental health MRS NS Paper of the Month Nutrition Nutrition Society Obesity Open Access Oryx parasitology PHN PHN Editorial Highlight politics Psychiatry psychological medicine Public Health Public Health Nutrition Social policy Weed Science Society of America WGBizHRs

Blog archive PRW16 RSS feed

  • 2019
    • January (25)
    • February (25)
  • 2018
    • January (38)
    • February (33)
    • March (59)
    • April (31)
    • May (33)
    • June (31)
    • July (39)
    • August (20)
    • September (30)
    • October (47)
    • November (45)
    • December (29)
  • 2017
    • January (26)
    • February (19)
    • March (22)
    • April (23)
    • May (29)
    • June (23)
    • July (31)
    • August (27)
    • September (46)
    • October (33)
    • November (52)
    • December (27)
  • 2016
    • January (7)
    • February (23)
    • March (19)
    • April (11)
    • May (21)
    • June (15)
    • July (24)
    • August (17)
    • September (22)
    • October (18)
    • November (22)
    • December (11)
  • 2015
    • January (15)
    • February (19)
    • March (14)
    • April (14)
    • May (12)
    • June (23)
    • July (11)
    • August (22)
    • September (7)
    • October (2)
    • November (10)
    • December (9)
  • 2014
    • January (15)
    • February (18)
    • March (11)
    • April (16)
    • May (9)
    • June (10)
    • July (8)
    • August (19)
    • September (17)
    • October (11)
    • November (15)
    • December (6)
  • 2013
    • January (12)
    • February (11)
    • March (15)
    • April (19)
    • May (20)
    • June (18)
    • July (20)
    • August (13)
    • September (14)
    • October (19)
    • November (17)
    • December (12)
  • 2012
    • January (1)
    • February (5)
    • March (10)
    • April (10)
    • May (9)
    • June (7)
    • July (7)
    • August (11)
    • September (10)
    • October (10)
    • November (13)
    • December (11)
  • About us
  • Terms of use
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy

© Copyright Cambridge Core 2016. All Rights Reserved.

Back to top Cambridge University Press